From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-15556-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17693 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2014 20:43:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 17657 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2014 20:43:25 -0000
From: "dblaikie at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug c++/16843] GDB relies on the mangled name of a subprogram to be
 a prefix of the enclosing class name
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dblaikie at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-16843-4717-tSkPOQvFMl@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-16843-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-16843-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-q2/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16843

--- Comment #2 from David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Gary Benson from comment #1)
> David, I don't have a copy of Clang to hand.  Could you run nm on the object
> files you have generated with GCC and Clang and paste the mangled symbol
> names here please?

Hmm, I'm not sure if that's relevant (I'm wondering if perhaps I did a poor job
explaining the problem - or I just don't understand it at all), but the default
output of "nm" for the two object files no matter whether they're compiled with
GCC or Clang is:

src1.cpp:
0000000000000000 T _Z4funcv
0000000000000000 W _ZN3fooILc1EE3memEv
0000000000000000 b _ZZ4funcvE1f

src2.cpp:
                 U _Z4funcv
0000000000000000 T main

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.