From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10776 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2014 23:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10753 invoked by uid 55); 24 Apr 2014 23:16:07 -0000 From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug build/16873] GDB 7.7 does not build with GCC 4.9 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: build X-Bugzilla-Version: 7.7 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sergiodj at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q2/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16873 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch, gdb-7.7-branch has been updated via 8a90a4ef6a9c5acb6fd363c7c556682578aa9254 (commit) from 87a1630ead223311c409d19e98553c4fa363cb59 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8a90a4ef6a9c5acb6fd363c7c556682578aa9254 commit 8a90a4ef6a9c5acb6fd363c7c556682578aa9254 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed Jan 29 13:46:39 2014 +0000 Following up on Tom's suggestion I am checking in a patch to replace the various bfd_xxx_set macros with static inline functions, so that we can avoid compile time warnings about comma expressions with unused values. PR build/16873 * bfd-in.h (bfd_set_section_vma): Delete. (bfd_set_section_alignment): Delete. (bfd_set_section_userdata): Delete. (bfd_set_cacheable): Delete. * bfd.c (bfd_set_cacheable): New static inline function. * section.c (bfd_set_section_userdata): Likewise. (bfd_set_section_vma): Likewise. (bfd_set_section_alignment): Likewise. * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: bfd/ChangeLog | 14 ++++++++++++++ bfd/bfd-in.h | 5 ----- bfd/bfd-in2.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ bfd/bfd.c | 8 ++++++++ bfd/section.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.