public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dmalcolm at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug c++/16874] Setting a breakpoint on function in anonymous namespace is unnecessarily awkward
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-16874-4717-JYdyePwU1j@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-16874-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16874
Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Can't break on function in |Setting a breakpoint on
|anonymous namespace |function in anonymous
| |namespace is unnecessarily
| |awkward
--- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com> ---
Renaming. It *is* possible to set a breakpoint on a function in an anonymous
namespace, it's just way too tricky to do it right now, given that
(A) you have to type the full qualified name, and
(B) tab-completion is broken
and these make it sufficiently difficult that it's effectively not possible for
a non-expert user.
So please can (A) and (B) be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-06 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 8:06 [Bug c++/16874] New: Can't break on function in anonymous namespace rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-25 9:10 ` [Bug c++/16874] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-29 21:04 ` dmalcolm at redhat dot com
2014-08-06 14:12 ` dmalcolm at redhat dot com [this message]
2014-09-13 8:10 ` [Bug c++/16874] Setting a breakpoint on function in anonymous namespace is unnecessarily awkward markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2014-09-19 14:55 ` patrick at parcs dot ath.cx
2014-09-19 15:22 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2014-09-19 15:26 ` patrick at parcs dot ath.cx
2014-09-22 7:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-26 4:32 ` patrick at parcs dot ath.cx
2015-08-13 6:54 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2015-08-26 1:19 ` patrick at parcs dot ath.cx
2020-07-22 14:38 ` palves at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-16874-4717-JYdyePwU1j@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).