From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C39E33858284; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 07:45:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C39E33858284 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1671867903; bh=7nYY/8HYXdpn3anvBQLvpGzIwy88bCCVWmzbiPvFqa4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mo5IR7Ywzg8g8tGNC2Z8VWSnko3y7uF1o5sNUvKxgvkklYMigZI43biWHPa+22q7n dkGaLfBYdSExCuZiDiwX32arc1HU6yj5oFRkteOSuE1drDbaQxW6kX22hSwBq9v1Jq rNP/Q3lXbH36OtrAyokGmR/7s9BvGDLbKs3hUGFY= From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/17016] XFAIL: gdb.threads/dlopen-libpthread.exp: info probes all rtld rtld_map_complete Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 07:45:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sergiodj at sergiodj dot net X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17016 Tom de Vries changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- I did a test run on ubuntu 22.04.1 x86_64 and I'm also seeing this. Reading through the thread pointed at by comment 1, it seems we need to test both scenarios of Fedora 17 glibc and upstream glibc, but currently we only test the former. FWIW, I've tried removing the rtld_ prefix of rtld_map_complete in the test-case, and ran into: ... FAIL: libpthread.so not found ... This is with glibc 2.35, which has libpthread integrated into glibc, so it's not suprising that libpthread is already loaded at main. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=