public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/17143] New: default obstack alignment wastes a lot of space on amd64-linux
@ 2014-07-11 17:57 dje at google dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: dje at google dot com @ 2014-07-11 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17143
Bug ID: 17143
Summary: default obstack alignment wastes a lot of space on
amd64-linux
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Keywords: performance
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gdb
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: dje at google dot com
The default obstack alignment on amd64-linux is 16 (sizeof (long double)).
This wastes a fair bit of space.
In one standard benchmark I use (with fission + .gdb_index):
With 16 byte alignment:
(gdb) mt set per on
(gdb) file benchmark
...
Command execution time: 16.404199 (cpu), 16.541558 (wall)
Space used: 721887232 (+718557184 for this command)
#symtabs: 5695 (+5695), #primary symtabs: 86 (+86), #blocks: 1061 (+1061)
With 8 byte alignment:
(gdb) mt set per on
(gdb) file benchmark
...
Command execution time: 15.198143 (cpu), 15.235198 (wall)
Space used: 688427008 (+685096960 for this command)
#symtabs: 5695 (+5695), #primary symtabs: 86 (+86), #blocks: 1061 (+1061)
[The cpu time difference isn't always as great, but I am consistently seeing a
0.25s difference at best.]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-07-11 17:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-11 17:57 [Bug gdb/17143] New: default obstack alignment wastes a lot of space on amd64-linux dje at google dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).