public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/17161] New: gdb confused about variable address in a nested function @ 2014-07-16 6:05 gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 0:54 ` [Bug gdb/17161] " gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net @ 2014-07-16 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17161 Bug ID: 17161 Summary: gdb confused about variable address in a nested function Product: gdb Version: 7.7 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdb Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net I have this C program: int main(void) { int v = 0; int b(void) { return v; } int a(void) { return b(); } return a(); } I build like this: $ gcc-4.9 -g -std=gnu11 -o tst tst.c The program runs without surprises. What IS surprising is what gdb thinks is the value of v and &v at various points. At "return a()" and inside b() gdb is correct: (gdb) p v $32 = 0 (gdb) p &v $33 = (int *) 0x7fffffffe450 However inside a(), gdb is confused about the address and the value of v: (gdb) s a () at tst.c:12 (gdb) p v $34 = 5658608 (gdb) p &v $35 = (int *) 0x7fffffffe430 This causes unnecessary confusion, I think. I'm using Debian/sid on an amd64 box. The gdb Debian package is version 7.7.1-2, although I was seeing this with 7.6 as well. Thanks dima -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17161] gdb confused about variable address in a nested function 2014-07-16 6:05 [Bug gdb/17161] New: gdb confused about variable address in a nested function gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net @ 2015-05-29 0:54 ` gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 11:09 ` palves at redhat dot com 2020-04-05 23:47 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net @ 2015-05-29 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17161 Dima Kogan <gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|7.7 |7.9 --- Comment #1 from Dima Kogan <gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net> --- Hi. This is a gentle ping. I just hit this bug again, and spent an hour making a nice test case for the report, only to realize that this bug has already been reported, by me of all people. The new 7.9.1 release is affected as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17161] gdb confused about variable address in a nested function 2014-07-16 6:05 [Bug gdb/17161] New: gdb confused about variable address in a nested function gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 0:54 ` [Bug gdb/17161] " gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net @ 2015-05-29 11:09 ` palves at redhat dot com 2020-04-05 23:47 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: palves at redhat dot com @ 2015-05-29 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17161 Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palves at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> --- There's a patch pending to address this: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-03/msg00627.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17161] gdb confused about variable address in a nested function 2014-07-16 6:05 [Bug gdb/17161] New: gdb confused about variable address in a nested function gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 0:54 ` [Bug gdb/17161] " gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 11:09 ` palves at redhat dot com @ 2020-04-05 23:47 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2020-04-05 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-prs https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17161 Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |7.11 CC| |ssbssa at sourceware dot org Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> --- I can reproduce this problem with gdb versions up to 7.10.1, but it's fixed since 7.11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-05 23:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-07-16 6:05 [Bug gdb/17161] New: gdb confused about variable address in a nested function gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 0:54 ` [Bug gdb/17161] " gdb at dima dot secretsauce.net 2015-05-29 11:09 ` palves at redhat dot com 2020-04-05 23:47 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).