From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 499E0385B506; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:54:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 499E0385B506 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1679529271; bh=GUrLaFjW1BUH/feL98OIkg2D9nqxTF8t1GusZogp/AI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I3f4r9/KX33CJIAhSO4BBqhTNtD6IlFBVorkZOf0LJcGDcVkgEqigOHg3lVSTU5FL 8Pm5MU3IbiBShv2Ry54R5/WTvcuKoS8sIx5Bxd5cBVdCQZEAzLEi43Ipm0Wy2yY8sH NYoK2o+toaW9Gm4xV5OaMLPaMXcv6FJSIQ97VCfQ= From: "dblaikie at gmail dot com" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug symtab/17272] DW_TAG_GNU_template_parameter_pack Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:54:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: symtab X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dblaikie at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17272 David Blaikie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dblaikie at gmail dot com --- Comment #12 from David Blaikie --- (In reply to Ed Catmur from comment #11) > Resent just now (no changes, just a better description): > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-February/196618.html Tried testing this with Clang's debug info (based on your request https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28946#c6 ) & at least for= the test case I had in mind/where I think the issue is visible, this patch didn= 't seem to help. Here's what I tried: ``` template struct single_and_pack { }; int main() { single_and_pack sap; } ``` ``` clang++ pack.cpp -g ``` ``` gdb ./a.out $ start $ ptype sap type =3D struct single_and_pack [with T =3D int] { } ``` There's the `T =3D int` part, but nothing for `Ts =3D {int}` or similar. (I did get some errors about `No module named 'gdb'` in case that's relevan= t - maybe something to do with how I'd build gdb) & it's possible I've messed up some application of the patch to building gd= b - (I've had issues with lldb, for instance, where lldb is built - but it uses= my system installed lldb .so, so I was still getting the old behavior, not sur= e if something similar might be happening with gdb) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=