From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1208 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2014 09:08:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1180 invoked by uid 55); 2 Oct 2014 09:08:12 -0000 From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug breakpoints/17431] follow-exec, "always-inserted on", breakpoints inserted too soon Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: breakpoints X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: palves at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17431 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch, master has been updated via 13fd3ff34329b882503c7c1ef44b3656d6ebb022 (commit) from 32990adaadc1b119700cd0dfd2dd8849114e0135 (commit) Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those revisions in full, below. - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=13fd3ff34329b882503c7c1ef44b3656d6ebb022 commit 13fd3ff34329b882503c7c1ef44b3656d6ebb022 Author: Pedro Alves Date: Thu Oct 2 09:55:38 2014 +0100 PR17431: following execs with "breakpoint always-inserted on" Following an exec with "breakpoint always-inserted on" tries to insert breakpoints in the new image at the addresses the symbols had in the old image. With "always-inserted off", we see: gdb gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec -ex "set breakpoint always-inserted off" GNU gdb (GDB) 7.8.50.20140924-cvs ... (gdb) b main Breakpoint 1 at 0x400664: file gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c, line 24. ^^^^^^^^ (gdb) c The program is not being run. (gdb) r Starting program: testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c:24 24 execl (BASEDIR "/multi-arch-exec-hello", (gdb) c Continuing. process 9212 is executing new program: gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec-hello Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/hello.c:40 40 bar(); (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x080484e4 in main at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/hello.c:40 ^^^^^^^^^^ breakpoint already hit 2 times (gdb) Note how main was 0x400664 in multi-arch-exec, and 0x080484e4 in gdb.multi/hello. With "always-inserted on", we get: Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c:24 24 execl (BASEDIR "/multi-arch-exec-hello", (gdb) c Continuing. infrun: target_wait (-1, status) = infrun: 9444 [process 9444], infrun: status->kind = execd infrun: infwait_normal_state infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 1. Cannot access memory at address 0x400664 (gdb) That is, GDB is trying to insert a breakpoint at 0x400664, after the exec, and then that address happens to not be mapped at all in the new image. The problem is that update_breakpoints_after_exec is creating breakpoints, which ends up in update_global_location_list immediately inserting breakpoints if "breakpoints always-inserted" is "on". update_breakpoints_after_exec is called very early when we see an exec event. At that point, we haven't loaded the symbols of the new post-exec image yet, and thus haven't reset breakpoint's addresses to whatever they may be in the new image. All we should be doing in update_breakpoints_after_exec is deleting breakpoints that no longer make sense after an exec. So the fix removes those breakpoint creations. The question is then, if not here, where are those breakpoints re-created? Turns out we don't need to do anything else, because at the end of follow_exec, we call breakpoint_re_set, whose tail is also creating exactly the same breakpoints update_breakpoints_after_exec is currently creating: breakpoint_re_set (void) { ... create_overlay_event_breakpoint (); create_longjmp_master_breakpoint (); create_std_terminate_master_breakpoint (); create_exception_master_breakpoint (); } A new test is added to exercise this. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20. gdb/ 2014-10-02 Pedro Alves PR breakpoints/17431 * breakpoint.c (update_breakpoints_after_exec): Don't create overlay, longjmp, std terminate nor exception breakpoints here. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-10-02 Pedro Alves PR breakpoints/17431 * gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.c: New file. * gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.exp: New file. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary of changes: gdb/ChangeLog | 6 + gdb/breakpoint.c | 5 - gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 + gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.c | 38 +++++++ .../gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.exp | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.c create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.exp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.