public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17455] gdb segfaults while demangling
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-17455-4717-nTkCh49pXS@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-17455-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17455
Jean-Michaël Celerier <jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jeanmichael.celerier@gmail.
| |com
--- Comment #4 from Jean-Michaël Celerier <jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com> ---
I get a similar crash with the following symbol :
_ZSt4moveIRZN5coppa8oscquery15WebSocketClientC1INS1_12RemoteDevice8m_clientMUlDpOT_E_EEEOT_EUlSt8weak_ptrIvEE_EONSt16remove_referenceIS9_E4typeESA_
The code is compiled with clang-3.6, and both gdb-7.9, lldb-3.6, and
c++filt-2.25.0 choke on the symbol.
When debugging c++filt with gdb, it seems like the infinite recursion is in
libbfd.so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
>From gdb-prs-return-17714-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org Tue Mar 24 12:45:22 2015
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-17714-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16845 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2015 12:45:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 16794 invoked by uid 55); 24 Mar 2015 12:45:16 -0000
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug breakpoints/16466] -break-insert and -dprintf-insert do not
remember a specified thread for a pending breakpoint
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: breakpoints
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: antoine.tremblay at ericsson dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-16466-4717-gToUzYKXJJ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-16466-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-16466-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00479.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1624
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id\x16466
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoine Tremblay <hexa@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h\x15630549010233e9d0f0b1971d27e121cd74bdd0
commit 15630549010233e9d0f0b1971d27e121cd74bdd0
Author: Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu Feb 19 15:23:34 2015 -0500
Fix breakpoint thread condition missing with mi and a pending breakpoint.
When setting a pending breakpoint with a thread condition while using
the mi interface, the thread condition would be lost by gdb when the
breakpoint
was resolved.
This patch fixes this behavior by setting the thread condition properly in
the
mi case.
Also, this patch modifies the mi-pending test case to test for this issue
and
removes some unneeded code in the testcase and dependency on stdio.
gdb/Changelog:
PR breakpoints/16466
* breakpoint.c (create_breakpoint): Set thread on breakpoint struct.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR breakpoints/16466
* gdb.mi/Makefile.in: Add mi-pendshr2.sl to cleanup.
* gdb.mi/mi-pending.c (thread_func): New function.
(int main): Add threading support required.
* gdb.mi/mi-pending.exp: Add tests for this issue.
* gdb.mi/mi-pendshr.c (pendfunc1): Remove stdio dependency.
(pendfunc2): Remove stdio dependency.
* gdb.mi/mi-pendshr2.c: New file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-24 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-05 12:37 [Bug c++/17455] New: " avi@cloudius-systems.com
2014-10-05 12:43 ` [Bug c++/17455] " avi@cloudius-systems.com
2014-10-06 9:37 ` gbenson at redhat dot com
2014-10-06 9:39 ` gbenson at redhat dot com
2015-03-24 12:45 ` jeanmichael.celerier at gmail dot com [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-17455-4717-nTkCh49pXS@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).