From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-16853-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13429 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2014 13:35:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 13403 invoked by uid 48); 20 Oct 2014 13:35:28 -0000
From: "sivachandra at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17494] New: Ternary operator not evaluated correctly
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sivachandra at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-17494-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494

            Bug ID: 17494
           Summary: Ternary operator not evaluated correctly
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: sivachandra at gmail dot com

Consider the following code:

class A
{
public:
  A () { a = 12345; }
  int geta ();

  int a;
};

int
A::geta ()
{
  return a;
}

int
main ()
{
  A a;
  return 0;  /* Break here  */
}

I see this with GDB:

(gdb) p a.geta()
$3 = 12345
(gdb) p false ? a.geta() : 123
$2 = {a = 12345}

The result is of the wrong type (and value).

Similarly:

(gdb) p (true ? 123 : a.geta()) + 1
Can't do that binary op on that type

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.