public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "brobecker at gnat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/17525] New: target-async: breakpoint commands not executed when program run from -x script
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-17525-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17525

            Bug ID: 17525
           Summary: target-async: breakpoint commands not executed when
                    program run from -x script
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gdb
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: brobecker at gnat dot com

We stumbled onto a regression that is making me think we should be making a GDB
7.8.2 release, after all.

On x86_64-linux, with current HEAD or 7.8, consider the following C program:

% cat foo.c
int
increment (int i)
{
  return i + 1;
}

#define N_INCR 20

int
main (void)
{
  int val = 1;
  int j;

  for (j = 0; j < N_INCR; j++)
    val = increment (val);
  return val == N_INCR;
}

And the following GDB script:

% cat cmds.gdb
file foo
break increment
commands
   cont
end
run

The script inserts a breakpoint on a function that gets called repetitively,
and adds a commands-list to that breakpoint that just "cont"s (until we reach
the end of the program).

However, trying to execute that script by passing it as a -x argument on the
command line yields the following behavior:

% /t.a/brobecke/bld/gdb-public/gdb/gdb -q -x cmds.gdb

Breakpoint 1 at 0x40049d: file foo.c, line 4.
Breakpoint 1, increment (i=1) at foo.c:4
4      return i + 1;

Breakpoint 1, increment (i=2) at foo.c:4
4      return i + 1;
(gdb)

Adding "maintenance set target-async off" makes the problem disappear.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


             reply	other threads:[~2014-10-30 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-30 18:23 brobecker at gnat dot com [this message]
2014-10-30 18:37 ` [Bug gdb/17525] " brobecker at gnat dot com
2015-01-13 17:57 ` palves at redhat dot com
2015-01-13 19:01 ` palves at redhat dot com
2015-01-13 21:03 ` dje at google dot com
2015-01-14 12:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-14 12:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-14 13:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-14 13:48 ` palves at redhat dot com
2021-11-08  8:28 ` richardshodges7 at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-17525-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).