public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/17681] New: Huge memory leak when using tab completion
@ 2014-12-05 16:15 hadess at hadess dot net
2014-12-07 18:55 ` [Bug gdb/17681] " xdje42 at gmail dot com
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hadess at hadess dot net @ 2014-12-05 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
Bug ID: 17681
Summary: Huge memory leak when using tab completion
Product: gdb
Version: unknown
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gdb
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hadess at hadess dot net
Using gdb-7.8.1-32.fc21.x86_64
I loaded up a GNOME application which ended up crashing in gdb, printed a
variable ("p priv"), then tried to print the contents of that struct, but
typo'ed. I typed "p priv-" followed by 2 tabs, instead of "p priv->" follow by
2 tabs.
The memory usage ballooned from 1.5GB or resident RAM to more than 3GB.
[99163.091566] Out of memory: Kill process 28369 (gdb) score 443 or sacrifice
child
[99163.091687] Killed process 28369 (gdb) total-vm:4576768kB,
anon-rss:3537952kB, file-rss:0kB
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17681] Huge memory leak when using tab completion
2014-12-05 16:15 [Bug gdb/17681] New: Huge memory leak when using tab completion hadess at hadess dot net
@ 2014-12-07 18:55 ` xdje42 at gmail dot com
2014-12-07 22:00 ` hadess at hadess dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: xdje42 at gmail dot com @ 2014-12-07 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xdje42 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com> ---
I suspect this is not a "leak" per se, but rather just gdb's horrendously bad
support for tab-completion.
The hypothesis is that gdb is reading and expanding all debug information -->
boom.
The "-", I think, triggers a search for all symbols.
There is a patch in the works to limit the damage.
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-11/msg00685.html
Beyond that, there is still more gdb can do to be smarter here, but at least
memory usage won't explode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17681] Huge memory leak when using tab completion
2014-12-05 16:15 [Bug gdb/17681] New: Huge memory leak when using tab completion hadess at hadess dot net
2014-12-07 18:55 ` [Bug gdb/17681] " xdje42 at gmail dot com
@ 2014-12-07 22:00 ` hadess at hadess dot net
2015-01-05 19:12 ` [Bug gdb/17681] Tab completion needs better throttling dje at google dot com
2022-04-08 2:04 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hadess at hadess dot net @ 2014-12-07 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
--- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess dot net> ---
Doug, I wrongly labelled the bug, it is indeed "normal" just not one bit
efficient. Feel free to retitle.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17681] Tab completion needs better throttling
2014-12-05 16:15 [Bug gdb/17681] New: Huge memory leak when using tab completion hadess at hadess dot net
2014-12-07 18:55 ` [Bug gdb/17681] " xdje42 at gmail dot com
2014-12-07 22:00 ` hadess at hadess dot net
@ 2015-01-05 19:12 ` dje at google dot com
2022-04-08 2:04 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dje at google dot com @ 2015-01-05 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
dje at google dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dje at google dot com
Summary|Huge memory leak when using |Tab completion needs better
|tab completion |throttling
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/17681] Tab completion needs better throttling
2014-12-05 16:15 [Bug gdb/17681] New: Huge memory leak when using tab completion hadess at hadess dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-05 19:12 ` [Bug gdb/17681] Tab completion needs better throttling dje at google dot com
@ 2022-04-08 2:04 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2022-04-08 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17681
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I think we have completion throttling now.
See "set max-completions"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-08 2:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-05 16:15 [Bug gdb/17681] New: Huge memory leak when using tab completion hadess at hadess dot net
2014-12-07 18:55 ` [Bug gdb/17681] " xdje42 at gmail dot com
2014-12-07 22:00 ` hadess at hadess dot net
2015-01-05 19:12 ` [Bug gdb/17681] Tab completion needs better throttling dje at google dot com
2022-04-08 2:04 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).