public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "xdje42 at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/17684] New: lookup of builtin types: correctness and performance issues
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 17:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-17684-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17684
Bug ID: 17684
Summary: lookup of builtin types: correctness and performance
issues
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: symtab
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: xdje42 at gmail dot com
This bug is to address the correctness and performance issues of gdb's current
handling of the lookup of builtin types, as discussed in PR 16994.
correctness: Though rare, we should still properly handle it,
which is if we're in a file where the STATIC_BLOCK doesn't provide a definition
for "double" (basetypes live in STATIC_BLOCK) and the fallback that gdb uses
(search all static blocks of all objfiles) happens to find a find a definition
of "double" in a file that was compiled with -fshort-double.
performance: We search in all static blocks of all objfiles.
The definition of "void" is typically not specified in debug info and yet gdb
can look up "void" a lot. Thus every time gdb goes to search "void" it will
look in all static blocks of all objfiles, find nothing, and only *then* does
c-exp.y:classify_name, for example, call
language_lookup_primitive_type_by_name.
Fixing this will require giving lookup_symbol (et.al.) the ability to return
builtin types as symbols. Patch to follow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-07 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-07 17:56 xdje42 at gmail dot com [this message]
2015-03-18 19:06 ` [Bug symtab/17684] " dje at google dot com
2025-03-12 10:01 ` sam at gentoo dot org
2025-03-12 10:01 ` sam at gentoo dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-17684-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).