From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 62B673858D35; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 16:41:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 62B673858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1699720919;
	bh=qLWA+SzyGDaaCc/Jy39psBe3+QCB+WKlrmiMiNmIRSE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kcNOUsCn4EMknXJZL4cZwJyz3zcJAL4whikek7GoN56vXO4ls59K8yxJzWzgZgp6n
	 zO+0K3o7NmhM6+5B+e97k/zuh69M/Qt6EnXI4CgENcbw6HcRnP3jHkQkbdlISwr2Wt
	 d0GxP/UT0/5rFFQQlkZG2A5sgvlU88Px8+DMMNic=
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tui/17849] Showing local variables in gdb tui window
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 16:41:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: tui
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-17849-4717-kZFRKk25QW@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-17849-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-17849-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17849

--- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Paul Buxton from comment #12)

> Ok finally got around to checking things out. It looks like Hannes series
> of patches were not merged, not sure why?

Not sure.  IIRC there were some review comments?

> If the locals/watched  support is something that is still of interest I c=
an
> checkout the source and test my code to see if it still works and then
> figure out the proper format/location to submit it as a patch.

I took a quick look at your code.
I'm not sure about using 'info locals' to make the output.
It could be done in a more "programmatic" way using some
infrastructure in the new DAP code -- inspecting scopes,
using pretty-printers, etc.

Another thought is whether the TUI can/should hook into the
existing "display" mechanism so that displays are routed to
a window.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=