public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/18002] gdb/infrun.c:2114: internal-error: resume: Assertion `tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint->loc->permanent' failed.
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-18002-4717-mZtFF1L6bl@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-18002-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18002
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=68901c4d439ebceecab927932c17ea1504747c02
commit 68901c4d439ebceecab927932c17ea1504747c02
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Mar 5 23:39:45 2015 +0000
PR gdb/18002: Fix reinsert of a permanent breakpoints
When we find out that a breakpoint is set on top of a program
breakpoint, we mark it as "permanent". E.g.,:
...
if (bp_loc_is_permanent (loc))
{
loc->inserted = 1;
loc->permanent = 1;
}
...
Note we didn't fill in the breakpoint's shadow (shadow_len remains 0).
In case the target claims support for evaluating breakpoint
conditions, GDB sometimes reinserts breakpoints that are already
inserted (to update the conditions on the target side). Since GDB
doesn't know whether the target supports evaluating conditions _of_
software breakpoints (vs hardware breakpoints, etc.) until it actually
tries it, if the target doesn't actually support z0 breakpoints, GDB
ends up reinserting a GDB-managed software/memory breakpoint
(mem-break.c).
And that is the case that is buggy: breakpoints that are marked
inserted contribute their shadows (if any) to the memory returned by
target_read_memory, to mask out breakpoints. Permanent breakpoints
are always marked as inserted. So if the permanent breakpoint doesn't
have a shadow yet in its shadow buffer, but we set shadow_len before
calling target_read_memory, then the still clear shadow_contents
buffer will be used by the breakpoint masking code... And then from
there on, the permanent breakpoint has a broken shadow buffer, and
thus any memory read out of that address will read bogus code, and
many random bad things fall out from that.
The fix is just to set shadow_len at the same time shadow_contents is
set, not one before and another after...
Fixes all gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp FAILs on PPC64 GNU/Linux gdbserver
and probably any other gdbserver port that doesn't do z0 breakpoints.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-03-05 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR gdb/18002
* mem-break.c (default_memory_insert_breakpoint): Set shadow_len
after reading the breakpoint's shadow memory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 12:14 [Bug gdb/18002] New: " qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-20 12:41 ` [Bug gdb/18002] " qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-05 21:44 ` palves at redhat dot com
2015-03-05 23:41 ` palves at redhat dot com
2015-03-05 23:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-03-06 15:29 ` palves at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-18002-4717-mZtFF1L6bl@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).