From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-prs-return-17581-listarch-gdb-prs=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24452 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2015 00:26:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-prs-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-prs@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: gdb-prs-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 23256 invoked by uid 48); 28 Feb 2015 00:26:31 -0000
From: "dje at google dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug record/18059] Why can't "record instruction-history" and
 "record function-call-history" work with "record full"?
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: record
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-18059-4717-WsZtEaFikC@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-18059-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-18059-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18059

--- Comment #2 from dje at google dot com ---
Well, if it's implemented for "btrace" it should be doable for "full".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.