From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 734B83857B93; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:34:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 734B83857B93
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1676565293;
	bh=gmyljfKv8QEpAeKoNhdhRnxqahn4p0heY2yvwnJ5EQs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fY8rLP+zVbxDcZq2CJUNrXciPqikP2cYQK9d1EfOMLlXwkVChmXbeT0/gLCiZIfvP
	 Z7jqxIpCbwu+7vf2fizcTzzNuAcw7g/rumdjpcxovI2/TaeSMC5SzRq0NqcwQjRszI
	 Z6QNhNw9cxld6ZiCEgxi5BJl1r8U4K0CNNwm35gM=
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/18404] [8 Regression] gdb fails to handle EM_486/EM_IAMCU
 binary
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:34:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-18404-4717-J5mbYp7ucg@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-18404-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-18404-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D18404

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2)
> Is this still relevant / necessary?

Yes.

> I see bfd_arch_iamcu in BFD still, and nothing in gdb.
> I don't know how to test this but the patch looks essentially
> fine to me.  It would just need an update for some renamings in gdb.

$ cat x.c
#include <stdio.h>

int
main ()
{
  printf ("hello\n");
  return 0;
}
$ gcc -m32 -g -static x.c
$ elfedit --output-mach=3Diamcu a.out
$ gdb a.out

will reproduce it.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=