From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A1CB8385B50A; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A1CB8385B50A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1677250011; bh=9XO3hjEyO17iy+i6c+8hwx32xh0X5TRDaDVTXmjY4sM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AXQYhrR62mVeEk03Xq86JCkFzzhV28JnqJrkOlTiO0T0p7SIqNDDcuHSjdwrLFvBq LeAjHMJJB9UQlvoOD5EyWX5j0xEIrZFaTdcQgnvlvsEWqqF7+mpwPMiKlPaw1ebc9Q HJlQxwtBTdoiSYNywVr5sVXQ3IYfEXFkffgEBTZU= From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug exp/20991] __int128 type support Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 14:46:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: exp X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20991 --- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Pedro Alves from comment #12) > I was looking at whether GMP already has built-in support for _finite_ > precision, for example so that we handle wraparound of "unsigned __int128" > values propertly, left shifting, etc. I couldn't find anything for that,= so > I guess we'd have to implement wraparound, etc. ourselves? Yeah. I suppose gcc's is nicer this way, you can specify the precision. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=