public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/21356] value.c:828: internal-error: int value_contents_bits_eq(const value*, int, const value*, int, int): Assertion `offset1 + length <= TYPE_LENGTH (val1->enclosing_type) * TARGET_CHAR_BIT' failed Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:34:48 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-21356-4717-UClp2oAbZK@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-21356-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21356 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2f33032a93f24ccc0c0d2f23e2a3ec0442f638d4 commit 2f33032a93f24ccc0c0d2f23e2a3ec0442f638d4 Author: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> Date: Thu Jun 11 14:34:44 2020 +0200 Compute proper length for dynamic types of TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF This patch fixes gdb/21356 in which we hit an assertion in value_contents_bits_eq: (gdb) p container_object2 (gdb) p container_object2 $1 = {_container_member2 = 15, _vla_struct_object2 = {_some_member = 0, _vla_field = { ../../src/gdb/value.c:829: internal-error: \ int value_contents_bits_eq(const value*, int, const value*, int, int): \ Assertion `offset1 + length \ <= TYPE_LENGTH (val1->enclosing_type) * TARGET_CHAR_BIT' failed. This is happening because TYPE_LENGTH (val1->enclosing_type) is erroneously based on enclosing_type, which is a typedef, instead of the actual underlying type. This can be traced back to resolve_dynamic_struct, where the size of the type is computed: ... TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (resolved_type, i) = resolve_dynamic_type_internal (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (resolved_type, i), &pinfo, 0); gdb_assert (TYPE_FIELD_LOC_KIND (resolved_type, i) == FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS); new_bit_length = TYPE_FIELD_BITPOS (resolved_type, i); if (TYPE_FIELD_BITSIZE (resolved_type, i) != 0) new_bit_length += TYPE_FIELD_BITSIZE (resolved_type, i); else new_bit_length += (TYPE_LENGTH (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (resolved_type, i)) * TARGET_CHAR_BIT); ... In this function, resolved_type is TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF which is not what we want to use to calculate the size of the actual field. This patch fixes this and the similar problem in resolve_dynamic_union. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-06-11 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> PR gdb/21356 * gdbtypes.c (resolve_dynamic_union, resolve_dynamic_struct): Resolve typedefs for type length calculations. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-06-11 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> PR gdb/21356 * gdb.base/vla-datatypes.c (vla_factory): Add typedef for struct vla_struct. Add new struct vla_typedef and union vla_typedef_union and corresponding instantiation objects. Initialize new objects. * gdb.base/vla-datatypes.exp: Add tests for vla_typedef_struct_object and vla_typedef_union_object. Fixup type for vla_struct_object. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 12:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-21356-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> 2020-06-10 11:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-06-11 12:34 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-06-11 12:36 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-21356-4717-UClp2oAbZK@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).