From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 9D0CA3896804; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:46:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9D0CA3896804
From: "palves at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/22395] ODR violations
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:46:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: build
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: palves at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-22395-4717-jLFcVAlYev@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-22395-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-22395-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:46:45 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22395

--- Comment #5 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #3)
> I got bit debugging an ODR problem in gdb today.
> I'd accidentally given a struct a name that was already in use.
> This would be nice to fix.

Note that in C, it's valid to have different definitions of structures in
different translation units.  If GDB isn't coping with that, then I'd say i=
t's
a GDB bug.

(Not saying we shouldn't fix the ODR violation, of course.)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=