From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7DDE4384242F; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:00:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7DDE4384242F
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug threads/22925] gdb assumes target can activate threads at will, 
 causes internal error in infrun.c in 'finish_step_over'
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:00:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: threads
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-22925-4717-g8ZxOMTHBp@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-22925-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-22925-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:00:24 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22925

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at sourceware dot o=
rg

--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
I'm a little confused on this one.

On the one hand -- the remote protocol doesn't have a way for
a target to explain that it isn't in control of scheduling.
This could be added, but only with some cooperation from gdb as well.

However in the example you did:

(gdb) b
(gdb) c

Doesn't that "b" set a breakpoint?
Then "continue" has to step off the breakpoint.
This is done by single-stepping, I suppose because
setting another breakpoint is difficult -- gdb or gdbserver
would have to decode instructions to find the next instruction.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=