From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id D6B933896831; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:24:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D6B933896831
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/23710] gdb is slow and memory hungry consuming debug
 generated with LTO by GCC
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:24:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-23710-4717-Yv9wtUDNow@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-23710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-23710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:24:07 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D23710

--- Comment #23 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #22)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #21)
> > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #20)
> > > Tom --
> > >=20
> > > See https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-June/179765.html
> > > I found out that if the test case from this patch is changed
> > > to use DW_LANG_C, it will fail.  (Of course I thinko'd that message
> > > and wrote C++, but the test already uses C++...)
> > >=20
> >=20
> > You mean gdb.dwarf2/imported-unit-bp.exp? That test-case uses C, right?
>=20
> Yeah,sorry.  I double confused myself I guess.
>=20
> If you convert that test to use DW_LANG_C_plus_plus, then run it, it will
> fail.
> So it seems to me that this patch had some unintended consequence.
> I haven't looked into why, and TBH it doesn't really make sense to me.
>=20
> > > Furthermore, the skipping should probably also be done in the psymtab
> > > reader, not just the full reader.
> >=20
> > Maybe, not sure yet.
>=20
> Normally the rule is that the psymtab reader and the full symtab reader
> must agree.  Now, this case is a bit weird in that nothing really checks
> whether a psymtab dependency is really read in.  Though, the above failure
> seems to indicate that it may matter.

Submitted patch to fix this:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-June/180229.html

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=