public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug mi/23820] No one handle "current_ui->prompt_state = PROMPT_NEEDED"
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:32:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-23820-4717-x1qGuA0T7K@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-23820-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23820

--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e8b4efc3cf3d5d2c475b3e5c31439aa5bcd277ae

commit e8b4efc3cf3d5d2c475b3e5c31439aa5bcd277ae
Author: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Date:   Thu Jan 6 08:42:49 2022 -0700

    Print MI prompt on interrupted command

    Joel noticed that if the remote dies unexpectedly during a command --
    you can simulate this by using "continue" and then killing gdbserver
    -- then the CLI will print a new prompt, but MI will not.  Later, we
    found out that this was also filed in bugzilla as PR mi/23820.

    The output looks something like this:

        | (gdb)
        | cont
        | &"cont\n"
        | ~"Continuing.\n"
        | ^running
        | *running,thread-id="all"
        | (gdb)
        | [... some output from GDB during program startup...]
        | =thread-exited,id="1",group-id="i1"
        | =thread-group-exited,id="i1"
        | &"Remote connection closed\n"

    Now, what about that "(gdb)" in the middle?

    That prompt comes from this questionable code in
    mi-interp.c:mi_on_resume_1:

          /* This is what gdb used to do historically -- printing prompt
             even if it cannot actually accept any input.  This will be
             surely removed for MI3, and may be removed even earlier.  */
          if (current_ui->prompt_state == PROMPT_BLOCKED)
            fputs_unfiltered ("(gdb) \n", mi->raw_stdout);

    ... which seems like something to remove.  But maybe the intent here
    is that this prompt is sufficient, and MI clients must be ready to
    handle output coming after a prompt.  On the other hand, if this code
    *is* removed, then nothing would print a prompt in this scenario.

    Anyway, the CLI and the TUI handle emitting the prompt here by hooking
    into gdb::observers::command_error, but MI doesn't install an observer
    here.

    This patch adds the missing observer and arranges to show the MI
    prompt.  Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34.

    It seems like this area could be improved a bit, by having
    start_event_loop call the prompt-displaying code directly, rather than
    indirecting through an observer.  However, I haven't done this.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23820

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-23820-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2022-02-24 16:46 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-02-25 14:03 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-02-25 14:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-02-25 14:33 ` tromey at sourceware dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-23820-4717-x1qGuA0T7K@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).