public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug symtab/25833] New: [cc-with-gdb-index] FAIL: gdb.base/with.exp: basics: with language ada -- print g_s
@ 2020-04-16  7:23 vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-05-13  6:20 ` [Bug symtab/25833] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-16  7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-prs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25833

            Bug ID: 25833
           Summary: [cc-with-gdb-index] FAIL: gdb.base/with.exp: basics:
                    with language ada -- print g_s
           Product: gdb
           Version: HEAD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: symtab
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

When running test-case with.exp with target board cc-with-gdb-index, we have:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/with.exp: basics: show language
with language ada -- print g_s^M
'g_s' has unknown type; cast it to its declared type^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/with.exp: basics: with language ada -- print g_s
...

This scenario hits this case:
...
static void
dw2_map_matching_symbols
  (struct objfile *objfile,
   const lookup_name_info &name, domain_enum domain,
   int global,
   gdb::function_view<symbol_found_callback_ftype> callback,
   symbol_compare_ftype *ordered_compare)
{
  /* Used for Ada.  */
  struct dwarf2_per_objfile *dwarf2_per_objfile
    = get_dwarf2_per_objfile (objfile);

  if (dwarf2_per_objfile->index_table != nullptr)
    {
      /* Ada currently doesn't support .gdb_index (see PR24713).  We can get    
         here though if the current language is Ada for a non-Ada objfile       
         using GNU index.  As Ada does not look for non-Ada symbols this        
         function should just return.  */
      return;
    }
...

The reasoning for do nothing here is from a language perspective.

But the problem is that it makes gdb behaviour inconsistent between:
- having a .gdb_index section, and 
- having a .gdb_names section, or a partial symtab, or -readnow.

I think it's better to have consistent behaviour, and we should fix this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-20  9:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-16  7:23 [Bug symtab/25833] New: [cc-with-gdb-index] FAIL: gdb.base/with.exp: basics: with language ada -- print g_s vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-13  6:20 ` [Bug symtab/25833] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-13  9:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-20  9:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-20  9:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-05-20  9:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).