From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 37C1F38582A1; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:48:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37C1F38582A1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1689770911;
	bh=EtO8t4jNxmlpUtqtukJLSHSLtdiGqRgWBwDqthFU6lY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=V2s0DPjbidR0hLr82kxAdz7UTATfMfn8c2qUBz3pYdlXdJ+9W8NC0H2c6vdX20YTu
	 bJDYpUDwNRN8FlyGLw2IF1jn0W8kDmMoTg4iud7YX1mixPKbVl5tGsnLzkGajtVvoj
	 DICb14wvfYknIL+KsjU2tZl2FnfltmBAs3bj2AX8=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/25857] Partial symtab expansion state influences lookup
 results
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 12:48:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: symtab
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-25857-4717-tJWzQ0xLCc@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-25857-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-25857-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25857

--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, the other problem is that readnow expands the symtabs in the order of =
the
debug info, while selective expansion of symtabs results in a list with
expansion order.

So, with this example:
...
$ cat main.c
int
main (void)
{
  return 0;
}
$ cat test.c
static int aaa =3D 1;
static int test1 =3D 1;
$ cat test-2.c
static int aaa =3D 2;
static int test2 =3D 2;
...
and:
...
$ gcc -g main.c test.c test-2.c
...
we still have:
...
$ gdb -q -batch a.out -ex "print test1" -ex "print test2" -ex "print aaa"
$1 =3D 1
$2 =3D 2
$3 =3D 2
$ gdb -q -batch a.out -ex "print test2" -ex "print test1" -ex "print aaa"
$1 =3D 2
$2 =3D 1
$3 =3D 1
...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=