From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 445C9385DC1C; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:42:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 445C9385DC1C
From: "ricky at rzhou dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug symtab/25874] Printing variables after noreturn functions uses
 the wrong DWARF info
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:42:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: symtab
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ricky at rzhou dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-25874-4717-Xm41NQAYzV@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-25874-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-25874-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:42:40 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25874

Ricky Zhou <ricky at rzhou dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Ricky Zhou <ricky at rzhou dot org> ---
Upon further reading, this looks like a duplicate of bug 25143 (see also the
corresponding Clang bug, https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D39752).

Looking at some of the discussion linked from the LLVM bug
(http://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2018-Decemb=
er/004500.html)
it looks like the correctness of fudging PC values is much more controversi=
al
than I could have imagined!

I now see that doing so does resolve the ambiguity between "right after the
last instruction of a function" and "first instruction of the next function=
".

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 25143 ***

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=