From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4535B3861823; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:40:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4535B3861823
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug rust/26197] rust FAILs with rustc 1.36.0 and llvm 7
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:40:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: rust
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.1
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-26197-4717-IrP4Ahumjd@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26197-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26197-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 19:40:56 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26197

--- Comment #12 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
FWIW with rust 1.12 I get these FAILs:

FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print univariant
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print univariant.a
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print univariant_anon
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print univariant_anon.0
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print univariant_anon.sss
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: ptype simple::Univariant (pattern 1)
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: ptype simple::UnivariantAnon (pattern 1)
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e2
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e.0
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e.1
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e.foo
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e2.variant
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e2.notexist
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print e2.0
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print int_some
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print int_none
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: print nonzero_offset
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: python print(e.type.fields()[1].name)
FAIL: gdb.rust/simple.exp: python
print(gdb.lookup_type('simple::MoreComplicated').dynamic)


At least the last one isn't a bug, but maybe the others are.
I have patches for a number of them.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=