From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id BBD84386F45F; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:10:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BBD84386F45F
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug exp/26519] wrong type used when printing value
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:10:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: exp
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-26519-4717-QEzrnlNg9h@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26519-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26519-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:10:25 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26519

--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #1)
> I don't think gdb has any way to know which one to pick.

Agreed.

> It guesses, but maybe it should error instead.
>=20

In case of C++, I think guessing is fine due to ODR.

But I think for C, we should indeed error.

Or perhaps, prompt to choose which variant (although you mentioned in PR257=
69
that you wanted to get rid of those prompts).

> I think there's another bug about making
>=20
> print * ('test4.c:struct ab' *) p
>=20
> ... work.

I see.  I found PR22718, perhaps that's the one you meant.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=