public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug python/26586] from_tty argument to Python's gdb.execute is no longer effective Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 18:02:09 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-26586-4717-wzciT4lvmf@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-26586-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26586 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Joel Brobecker <brobecke@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8f9929bb97dc0f0fdf60269ac8c9a7d50746646f commit 8f9929bb97dc0f0fdf60269ac8c9a7d50746646f Author: Gareth Rees <grees@undo.io> Date: Sat Sep 26 11:01:45 2020 -0700 gdb: Fix from_tty argument to gdb.execute in Python. Prior to commit 56bcdbea2b, the from_tty keyword argument to the Python function gdb.execute controlled whether the command took input from the terminal. When from_tty=True, "starti" and similar commands prompted the user: (gdb) python gdb.execute("starti", from_tty=True) The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y Starting program: /bin/true Program stopped. When from_tty=False, these commands did not prompt the user, and "yes" was assumed: (gdb) python gdb.execute("starti", from_tty=False) Program stopped. However, after commit 56bcdbea2b, the from_tty keyword argument no longer had this effect. For example, as of commit 7ade7fba75: (gdb) python gdb.execute("starti", from_tty=True) The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Starting program: /bin/true Program stopped. Note the "[answered Y; input not from terminal]" in the output even though from_tty=True was requested. Looking at commit 56bcdbea2b, it seems that the behaviour of the from_tty argument was changed accidentally. The commit message said: Let gdb.execute handle multi-line commands This changes the Python API so that gdb.execute can now handle multi-line commands, like "commands" or "define". and there was no mention of changing the effect of the from_tty argument. It looks as though the code for setting the instream to nullptr was accidentally moved from execute_user_command() to execute_control_commands() along with the other scoped restores. Accordingly, the simplest way to fix this is to partially reverse commit 56bcdbea2b by moving the code for setting the instream to nullptr back to execute_user_command() where it was to begin with. Additionally, add a test case to reduce the risk of similar breakage in future. gdb/ChangeLog: PR python/26586 * cli/cli-script.c (execute_control_commands): don't set instream to nullptr here as this breaks the from_tty argument to gdb.execute in Python. (execute_user_command): set instream to nullptr here instead. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR python/26586 * gdb.python/python.exp: add test cases for the from_tty argument to gdb.execute. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-26 18:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-08 15:23 [Bug python/26586] New: " grees at undo dot io 2020-09-08 16:33 ` [Bug python/26586] " grees at undo dot io 2020-09-08 17:05 ` brobecker at gnat dot com 2020-09-10 17:35 ` simark at simark dot ca 2020-09-10 17:35 ` simark at simark dot ca 2020-09-10 17:36 ` simark at simark dot ca 2020-09-19 15:39 ` cbiesinger at google dot com 2020-09-22 10:24 ` grees at undo dot io 2020-09-26 18:02 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-09-28 20:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-10-08 17:42 ` simark at simark dot ca
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-26586-4717-wzciT4lvmf@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).