public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/26828] SIGSEGV in follow_die_offset dwarf2/read.c:22950
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 18:39:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26828-4717-FykqBnE4Mv@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26828-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26828

--- Comment #28 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Marchi <simark@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=08ac57714cd20e528efe9b4e169f3a2778cf6e30

commit 08ac57714cd20e528efe9b4e169f3a2778cf6e30
Author: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Date:   Tue Feb 23 13:37:44 2021 -0500

    gdb/dwarf: create and destroy dwarf2_per_bfd's CUs-to-expand queue

    As described in the log of patch "gdb/dwarf: add assertion in
    maybe_queue_comp_unit", it would happen that a call to
    maybe_queue_comp_unit would enqueue a CU in the to-expand queue while
    nothing up the stack was processing the queue.  This is not desirable,
    as items are then left lingering in the queue when we exit the
    dwarf2/read code.  This is an inconsistent state.

    The normal case of using the queue is when we go through
    dw2_do_instantiate_symtab and process_queue.  As depended-on CUs are
    found, they get added to the queue.  process_queue expands CUs until the
    queue is empty.

    To catch these cases where things are enqueued while nothing up the
    stack is processing the queue, change dwarf2_per_bfd::queue to be an
    optional.  The optional is instantiated in dwarf2_queue_guard, just
    before where we call process_queue.  In the dwarf2_queue_guard
    destructor, the optional gets reset.  Therefore, the queue object is
    instantiated only when something up the stack is handling it.  If
    another entry point tries to enqueue a CU for expansion, an assertion
    will fail and we know we have something to fix.

    dwarf2_queue_guard sounds like the good place for this, as it's
    currently responsible for making sure the queue gets cleared if we exit
    due to an error.

    This also allows asserting that when age_comp_units or remove_all_cus
    run, the queue is not instantiated, and gives us one more level of
    assurance that we won't free the DIEs of a CU that is in the
    CUs-to-expand queue.

    gdb/ChangeLog:

            PR gdb/26828
            * dwarf2/read.c (dwarf2_queue_guard) <dwarf2_queue_guard>:
            Instantiate queue.
            (~dwarf2_queue_guard): Clear queue.
            (queue_comp_unit): Assert that queue is
            instantiated.
            (process_queue): Adjust.
            * dwarf2/read.h (struct dwarf2_per_bfd) <queue>: Make optional.

    Change-Id: I8fe3d77845bb4ad3d309eac906acebe79d9f0a9d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-02 10:42 [Bug gdb/26828] New: " nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-02 13:25 ` [Bug gdb/26828] " simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-02 15:21 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-02 15:36 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-03 11:36 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-03 13:37 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-03 14:03 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-03 14:32 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-03 15:02 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-03 17:05 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-03 19:45 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-03 19:52 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-03 20:14 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-03 20:52 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-04  7:43 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-04 16:53 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-08 16:16 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-08 16:17 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-08 16:45 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-10 14:15 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-13 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-13 17:22 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-13 18:13 ` nilsgladitz at gmail dot com
2020-11-16 18:21 ` simark at simark dot ca
2020-11-17 19:13 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-01-21  2:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-20 19:35 ` ReD at idp dot it
2021-02-20 20:40 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-02-23 18:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 18:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-02-23 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 23:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-23 23:32 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-06-27 17:58 ` ahmedsayeed1982 at yahoo dot com
2021-08-10 12:45 ` ucelsanicin at yahoo dot com
2021-09-02 11:06 ` donipah907 at mtlcz dot com
2021-09-02 11:17 ` mark at klomp dot org
2021-09-06  9:08 ` focixujo at livinginsurance dot co.uk
2021-09-10 19:39 ` mehmetgelisin at aol dot com
2021-09-22 10:19 ` diheto5497 at secbuf dot com
2021-09-22 13:58 ` ReD at idp dot it
2021-09-28  1:20 ` crownfamilydentistry at hotmail dot com
2021-10-09 11:00 ` gulsenenginar at aol dot com
2021-10-17 19:48 ` vmireskazki at gmail dot com
2021-10-19  7:15 ` progonsaytu at gmail dot com
2021-10-24 10:03 ` glassmtech at ukr dot net
2021-11-24 13:44 ` allen at rockvalleymarketing dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-26828-4717-FykqBnE4Mv@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).