From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4C1353857026; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:04:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C1353857026 From: "simark at simark dot ca" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug gdb/26861] internal-error: void target_mourn_inferior(ptid_t): Assertion `ptid == inferior_ptid' failed. OS: Mac OSX Catalina; Compiler: GCC; Language: C Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:04:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: simark at simark dot ca X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:04:52 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26861 Simon Marchi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2021-02-24 --- Comment #15 from Simon Marchi --- (In reply to Philippe Blain from comment #13) > Hi Simon,=20 >=20 > I recompiled with your patch on top of the latest master f16ccf47d87 > (Automatic date update in version.in, 2021-02-23) and re-ran my test and = it > works correctly. Great, thanks. >=20 > The patch did not apply directly on top of the 10.1 tarball or the > gdb-10-branch branch though. I don't know how release management is done = for > this project so I don't know if it matters, i.e. would the patch be > backported for a 10.2 release or something like this. Development happens on master, but if this is a regression we can backport = it to the gdb-10-branch, so it is included in the upcoming GDB 10.2 release. I think it wouldn't hurt in this case. >=20 > Thanks for the patch. >=20 > Sign=C3=A9: un confr=C3=A8re de Poly! Yay! (In reply to Philippe Blain from comment #14) > Forget my comment about the patch not applying to the 10.1 branch, it doe= s. Ok, thanks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=