From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B5BEB3A4B834; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:06:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B5BEB3A4B834
From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/26863] GDB crash when opening PowerPC core on x86-64 machine
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:06:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-26863-4717-prBNWl3sk0@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-26863-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-26863-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:06:41 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26863

Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at sourceware dot o=
rg

--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
It's difficult to know if this papers over anything.

The old code probably just worked by mistake:

-  struct target_section *p;
-
-  for (p =3D solib->sections; p < solib->sections_end; p++)
-    if (p->addr <=3D address && address < p->endaddr)

The loop will presumably not run because both pointers are null.

Tom de Vries checked in the null check a while back.

commit 76547ab31b16b521e29892cab5a29b60b52291a5
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Wed Oct 14 12:24:42 2020 +0200

    [gdb] Fix segfault in solib_contains_address_p

So maybe this is just a dup of PR 26733.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=