From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4F639385B512; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 09:14:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4F639385B512 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1696238076; bh=Ar8971FzRHpQBK47eevbLgJr9enAaYFL8Z53RzcLE/I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OVKkGp1N8zCbi4YOMkXxJXHdsN1ocvqOJ0O6Gsfv0OcdUtphrGQ8ZFnrF/TZwu5U1 raH/SFbgQE0I3mXgtOdloqKpRFN0eD+wCsVhPleUw1omyxgcyWHmQkezUqRlXjAq3T I7ei+PhXn1tQXggdPSmdKAqMbRjBqBV1wrRyxQZE= From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug go/27238] [gcc-11] FAIL: gdb.go/package.exp: setting breakpoint at package2.Foo Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 09:14:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: go X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D27238 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- This is about supporting v3 mangling, introduced in gcc 11: ... commit a01dda3c23b836754814fab1cab949a1bbc641e8 Author: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon Nov 16 20:06:53 2020 -0800 compiler, libgo: change mangling scheme Overhaul the mangling scheme to avoid ambiguities if the package path contains a dot. Instead of using dot both to separate components and to mangle characters, use dot only to separate components and use underscore to mangle characters. For golang/go#41862 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/gofrontend/+/271726 ... Difference in style: ... + // Original mangling: go.l__ufer.Run + // Mangling v2: go.l..u00e4ufer.Run + // Mangling v3: go_0l_u00e4ufer.Run ... Explained in more detail in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/41862#issuecomment-707244103 (second pa= th case was chosen, AFAICT). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=