From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 0AB4E394EC2E; Mon,  8 Mar 2021 20:21:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0AB4E394EC2E
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug ada/27545] FAIL: gdb.ada/tagged.exp: ptype obj
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 20:21:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-27545-4717-ltUl7zWHHh@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-27545-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-27545-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 20:21:37 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D27545

--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2)
> My testing didn't notice a regression here because it
> was failing before:
>=20
> ptype obj
> type =3D new pck.object with record
>     C4b: array (1 .. 8) of system.storage_elements.storage_element;
> end record
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/tagged.exp: ptype obj
>=20
>=20
>=20
> However, I do see that the way it fails has changed.

For me, it went from pass to fail.  At
d308ba78cfaf7c1b3a8d33ceb66c9a180352b888^ (so, the commit before things bro=
ke)
I have:
...
(gdb) ptype obj^M
type =3D new pck.object with record^M
    width: integer;^M
end record^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tagged.exp: ptype obj
...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=