From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 764B3385BF9E; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:58:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 764B3385BF9E
From: "edd at theunixzoo dot co.uk" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/27593] Scrolling up can be extremely slow.
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:58:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: edd at theunixzoo dot co.uk
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-27593-4717-PVDa69z1pc@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-27593-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-27593-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:58:20 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D27593

--- Comment #2 from Edd Barrett <edd at theunixzoo dot co.uk> ---
Thanks for the fast response.

I was about to say "why can't it disassemble backwards", but that's not rea=
lly
doable on variable-length opcodes.

If it can't be optimised, then perhaps there could be some kind of "function
start cache" so that the cost is only paid once? Probably needs some user
feedback also?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=