public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "simark at simark dot ca" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/27710] remote-notif.c:113: internal-error: void remote_async_get_pending_events_handler(gdb_client_data): Assertion `target_is_non_stop_p ()' failed
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:58:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-27710-4717-H7ItJMdD7k@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27710-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27710

--- Comment #19 from Simon Marchi <simark at simark dot ca> ---
I don't really understand this supposed separation of concerns between remote.c
and remote-notif.c.  They both know about each other: remote_target (well,
remote_state) uses remote_notif_state, and remote_notif_state (and
notif_client) only works with remote_target as its user.  Anyway.

To avoid all this churn, I'd be fine with a new util function
"remote_target_is_non_stop", implemented in remote.c, like:

bool
remote_target_is_non_stop_p (remote_target *t)
{
  scoped_restore_current_thread restore_thread;
  switch_to_target_no_thread (t);

  return target_is_non_stop_p ();
}

You could then use

gdb_assert (remote_target_is_non_stop_p (remote_target))

in remote-notif.c.

If / when target_is_non_stop_p becomes a method on target_ops and hopefully
independent from the current context, it could be simplified to:

bool
remote_target_is_non_stop_p (remote_target *t)
{
  return t->is_non_stop_p ();
}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 13:39 [Bug gdb/27710] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 13:41 ` [Bug gdb/27710] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 13:44 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-08 14:02 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-04-14  8:29 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14  8:57 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14  9:59 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 10:12 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 12:51 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-04-14 12:56 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 12:58 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-04-14 13:13 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-04-14 15:06 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 15:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 15:34 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-14 17:03 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-04-14 17:19 ` cbiesinger at google dot com
2021-04-14 17:20 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-04-15  7:34 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-15 17:58 ` simark at simark dot ca [this message]
2021-04-16  8:03 ` [Bug remote/27710] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22  8:53 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 15:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-22 15:01 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-27710-4717-H7ItJMdD7k@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).