public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "simark at simark dot ca" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug threads/28014] gdb coredumps when remote+kgdbing a system that OOMs too hard
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 01:20:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28014-4717-JpGDMZd3HB@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28014-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28014

Simon Marchi <simark at simark dot ca> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |simark at simark dot ca

--- Comment #1 from Simon Marchi <simark at simark dot ca> ---
Hi Rich,

(In reply to Rich from comment #0)
> I was using gdb on mips64el under qemu-user to remote a qemu of a mips64el
> system with kgdb, everything was going fine (from gdb's perspective - the
> system was in the process of eating all the RAM), then things went south.

Unrelated to the reported problem, but do you run GDB as a mips64el program
inside qemu-user only so that you can debug your remote mips64el program?  It
might be easier to run an x86-64 GDB (or whatever your host system is) to
connect to your mips64el remote.  That GDB just needs to be built to include
mips support, using --target=<your-triplet>, or
--enable-targets=<your-triplet>, or --enable-targets=all.

> The kernel reported, after a whole bunch of other screaming:
> [59702.844702] Out of memory and no killable processes...
> [59702.845130] Kernel panic - not syncing: System is deadlocked on memory
> 
> Meanwhile, when I tabbed back over, gdb said:
> [New Thread 172398]
> [New Thread 172401]
> [New Thread 172402]
> [New Thread 172403]
> [New Thread 172404]
> [New Thread 172405]
> --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--
> 
> Thread 2 received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
> [Switching to Thread 1]
> /build/gdb-OSO7kB/gdb-10.1/gdb/thread.c:95: internal-error: thread_info*
> inferior_thread(): Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
> further debugging may prove unreliable.
> Quit this debugging session? (y or n) y
> 
> This is a bug, please report it.  For instructions, see:
> <https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>.
> 
> /build/gdb-OSO7kB/gdb-10.1/gdb/thread.c:95: internal-error: thread_info*
> inferior_thread(): Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.
> A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
> further debugging may prove unreliable.
> Create a core file of GDB? (y or n) y
> qemu: uncaught target signal 6 (Aborted) - core dumped
> Aborted
> 
> 
> And so I'm here.
> 
> (I won't be astonished if you just close this with "everything was on fire,
> what are you expecting", but since gdb did request I open a bug, here I am.)

I presume that the remote connection (what kind of connection was that, tcp?)
closed at an unexpected time.  GDB is not very good at handling that
gracefully.  

It might not be a bug somebody will immediately jump to fix, but every time you
hit a GDB internal error, you can consider it a valid GDB bug.  It should never
be possible for a user to hit an internal error, whatever the bad input they
provide (including a remote connection breaking at an unexpected moment).  

> Since the core is 80M compressed and 236M uncompressed, you can find it:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/u7erpk1x6fj4ds6/qemu_gdb_20210625-192829_18450.
> core.zst?dl=0

There's little we can do without the gdb executable that goes along with the
core file.  Can you provide that too?  If we can get a good backtrace of GDB,
at least we'll be able to rough idea.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-26  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-25 23:43 [Bug threads/28014] New: " rincebrain at gmail dot com
2021-06-26  1:20 ` simark at simark dot ca [this message]
2021-06-26  2:15 ` [Bug threads/28014] " rincebrain at gmail dot com
2021-06-26  2:29 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-06-26  2:41 ` rincebrain at gmail dot com
2021-06-26  4:27 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-06-26 10:55 ` rincebrain at gmail dot com
2021-06-26 13:04 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-06-27  5:27 ` simark at simark dot ca
2021-06-27 12:24 ` rincebrain at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-28014-4717-JpGDMZd3HB@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).