public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug mi/28076] [regression] Cannot remove condition from breakpoint from MI Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:36:23 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-28076-4717-jIdoMcoNMu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-28076-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28076 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The gdb-11-branch branch has been updated by Tankut Baris Aktemur <aktemur@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=86271cfa326990fc05b5abada2831da161c0bf4b commit 86271cfa326990fc05b5abada2831da161c0bf4b Author: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> Date: Mon Jul 26 08:25:03 2021 +0200 gdb/mi: handle no condition argument case for -break-condition As reported in PR gdb/28076 [1], passing no condition argument to the -break-condition command (e.g.: "-break-condition 2") should clear the condition for breakpoint 2, just like CLI's "condition 2", but instead an error message is returned: ^error,msg="-break-condition: Missing the <number> and/or <expr> argument" The current implementation of the -break-condition command's argument handling (79aabb7308c "gdb/mi: add a '--force' flag to the '-break-condition' command") was done according to the documentation, where the condition argument seemed mandatory. However, the -break-condition command originally (i.e. before the 79aabb7308c patch) used the CLI's "cond" command, and back then not passing a condition argument was clearing out the condition. So, this is a regression in terms of the behavior. Fix the argument handling of the -break-condition command to allow not having a condition argument, and also update the document to make the behavior clear. Also add test cases to test the scenarios which were previously not covered. [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28076 gdb/ChangeLog: 2021-07-26 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> PR gdb/28076 * mi/mi-cmd-break.c (mi_cmd_break_condition): Handle the case of having no condition argument. gdb/doc/ChangeLog: 2021-07-26 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> PR gdb/28076 * gdb.texinfo (GDB/MI Breakpoint Commands): Mention clearing the condition in the -break-condition command. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2021-07-26 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> PR gdb/28076 * gdb.mi/mi-break.exp: Add more tests to check clearing the breakpoint condition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-26 6:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-11 18:51 [Bug mi/28076] New: " jonah at kichwacoders dot com 2021-07-11 18:57 ` [Bug mi/28076] " jonah at kichwacoders dot com 2021-07-12 0:22 ` simark at simark dot ca 2021-07-12 5:54 ` tankut.baris.aktemur at intel dot com 2021-07-17 18:48 ` brobecker at gnat dot com 2021-07-26 6:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-07-26 6:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-28 18:17 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-28076-4717-jIdoMcoNMu@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).