From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 467B3385741A; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:16:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 467B3385741A From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug ada/28180] FAIL: gdb.ada/interface.exp: print s (timeout) Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:16:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:16:37 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28180 Tom Tromey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brobecke at sourceware dot= org --- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #3) > Hmm, so ada uses named artifical variables that need to be in the symbol > table in order to evaluate them, but they should be ignored in terms of g= db > commands that investigate source constructs like "p s". That seems to be > the root cause. Yeah, Ada uses a special setup where some debug info is expressed via magic symbol names. The Ada compiler is moving away from this -- gcc recently switched its default to "minimal encodings", but even with this in place there are still some things that require this treatment. > Any thoughts on the patch ? Unless there's some strong need, my inclination would be to not do anything special to support older versions of the compiler. We're trying to move everything to "real DWARF", at least to the extent that this is possible. Joel is away right now, but I'll CC him to see what he thinks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=