public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "luis.machado at arm dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/28219] arm-none-eabi-gdb, .../gdb/utils.c:671: "internal-error: virtual memory exhausted: can't allocate 4064 bytes"
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:56:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28219-4717-sWZOL5lGqo@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28219-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28219

--- Comment #11 from Luis Machado <luis.machado at arm dot com> ---
Hi Dominic,

Thanks for sharing the data. I gave this a try on Linux, and I can't reproduce
it with any of master, 12.1-Rel1 or 11.3-Rel1 gdb's. I did notice newer gdb's
take longer to load data, and that is most likely due to a rewrite in the DWARF
reader that cause some slowdowns in some situations.

Now, I've noticed you are using the windows version of the Arm toolchain. In
that case, the gdb binary will be a 32-bit executable.

During reading of symbols and debug info, expansions (specially with macro
info) may cause gdb to go over the limit of 4GB. While that is not an issue for
a 64-bit process, it likely is for a 32-bit process.

I think that is a limitation of the Windows toolchain release at the moment
(shipping 32-bit binaries). I'd advise getting in touch through the Arm
community forum and checking when 64-bit tools for Windows will be available.

Otherwise, I think using -g as opposed to -g3 might be another workaround for
now, unfortunately.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-10 20:32 [Bug gdb/28219] New: " bmcdonnell at fischerblock dot com
2021-08-10 20:33 ` [Bug gdb/28219] " bmcdonnell at fischerblock dot com
2022-04-22  9:12 ` jose.simoes at eclo dot solutions
2022-05-04 23:58 ` jose.simoes at eclo dot solutions
2022-05-05 13:44 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-10-13  9:20 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2022-10-21 10:00 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-11 14:45 ` bmcdonnell at fischerblock dot com
2023-07-18 14:10 ` me at dominicclifton dot name
2023-07-18 14:32 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-18 16:02 ` me at dominicclifton dot name
2023-07-18 16:10 ` me at dominicclifton dot name
2023-07-19  9:56 ` luis.machado at arm dot com [this message]
2023-07-19 12:01 ` me at dominicclifton dot name
2023-07-19 13:01 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-19 13:04 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-19 13:35 ` me at dominicclifton dot name
2023-07-19 13:48 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-19 13:49 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-19 14:07 ` me at dominicclifton dot name
2023-07-19 14:56 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2023-07-19 16:12 ` luis.machado at arm dot com
2023-07-20  1:30 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2023-07-20 13:45 ` luis.machado at arm dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-28219-4717-sWZOL5lGqo@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).