From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E7D353858D28; Fri,  5 Nov 2021 12:59:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E7D353858D28
From: "massimiliano.cuoghi at systemceramics dot com"
 <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug breakpoints/28288] GDBserver should hide unreported fork childs
 from thread lists
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 12:59:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: breakpoints
X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: massimiliano.cuoghi at systemceramics dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28288-4717-3b5taEqsbq@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28288-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28288-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 12:59:17 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28288

--- Comment #22 from Massimiliano <massimiliano.cuoghi at systemceramics do=
t com> ---
(In reply to Simon Marchi from comment #21)
> Is it the patch I gave you that makes things slower, or a newer GDB versus
> an older GDB?  Do you have a specific scenario I could test to see the
> performance difference?

i did the test using qtcreator. gdbserver 8.2.1 is very fast to do "Step Ov=
er"
while from gdb11 for the same operation it takes 5 seconds, so I can say th=
at
it is not a problem of the patch, because I tried the patch with version 12.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=