From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A2DA73857407; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:53:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2DA73857407
From: "wilson at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/28486] [riscv64] GDB doesn't allow stepping over cbreak
 trap instruction
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:53:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-28486-4717-EzWfPxNdiN@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28486-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28486-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:53:28 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28486

--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On IRC, Jessica Clarke suggested that gcc could use unimp for a program end=
ing
trap, thus leaving ebreak for user breakpoints.  I think we are already usi=
ng
unimp for something else (padding bytes in text?), but that probably doesn't
conflict with the new proposed use.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=