public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tdep/28623] Missing catching return of execve syscall of PowerPC Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 17:00:27 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-28623-4717-J6sGHXWWqI@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-28623-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28623 --- Comment #5 from ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com --- So if I get this correctly, the problem is that the execve syscall doesn't really "return" as such, but rather starts execution at the entry point of the new executable. At this point, memory contents reflect the new executable and register context are reset to the default setting on startup. This means that you cannot reliably detect that you previously executed execve, as that requires looking at memory and/or register contents (depending on platform ABI details). I guess your suggested patch(es) are heuristics to work around that problem, but this seems somewhat fragile to me. On the other hand, there is a reliable way to detect that we just executed an execve syscall, and that is the TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD wait state. Maybe the catch syscall logic, in the special case of catching execve, should somehow hook into that event instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 17:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-24 19:27 [Bug gdb/28623] New: " simark at simark dot ca 2023-11-16 10:30 ` [Bug gdb/28623] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-16 10:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-16 11:48 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-16 11:50 ` [Bug tdep/28623] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-16 11:51 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-16 17:00 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com [this message] 2023-11-17 12:37 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-17 14:32 ` ulrich.weigand at de dot ibm.com 2023-11-17 20:57 ` simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca 2023-11-20 15:44 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-20 15:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-21 12:42 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-23 14:53 ` sam at gentoo dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-28623-4717-J6sGHXWWqI@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).