From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id A35E7385AC28; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:33:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A35E7385AC28
From: "aburgess at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/28801] "gdb/gdbtypes.h:441: internal-error: LONGEST
 dynamic_prop::const_val() const: Assertion `m_kind == PROP_CONST' failed"
 when listing functions
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:33:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aburgess at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-28801-4717-mMbcR9uGBe@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-28801-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-28801-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:33:50 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28801

Andrew Burgess <aburgess at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aburgess at redhat dot com

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Burgess <aburgess at redhat dot com> ---
Tom,

I think that patch should go in.  It may not give the user the answer they
want, but given we immediately call the const_val method, I think checking =
only
for the UNDEFINED case seems a bad idea.

Just my thoughts...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=