public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tankut.baris.aktemur at intel dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug gdb/28942] Problem with breakpoint condition calling a function in multi-threaded program
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:34:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-28942-4717-EkOm4AbDER@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28942-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28942
Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur at intel dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.
| |com
--- Comment #4 from Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur at intel dot com> ---
A highly-related patch series was this:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-March/176654.html
Perhaps there are a few useful things that still apply to the current master.
> In all-stop over an all-stop target:
>
> 1. A thread hits a breakpoint, all threads are stopped while we process
> the breakpoint hit
> 2. When doing the infcall in the breakpoint condition, all threads are
> resumed (is this what would happen if the user were to do a manual infcall?)
I think GDB should act like the "scheduler-locking on" mode in this case,
because if another thread has a pending event, the condition evaluation
could be dismissed. This is what distinguishes an infcall in condition
evaluation from a manual infcall. The series linked above introduced an
`in_cond_eval` flag to make this distinction.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 19:40 [Bug gdb/28942] New: " simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
2022-03-04 11:15 ` [Bug gdb/28942] " aburgess at redhat dot com
2022-03-04 14:01 ` aburgess at redhat dot com
2022-03-04 14:44 ` simark at simark dot ca
2022-03-07 7:34 ` tankut.baris.aktemur at intel dot com [this message]
2022-10-21 17:57 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-10-21 17:57 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2022-10-21 17:58 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
2024-03-25 17:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-07-02 16:34 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-28942-4717-EkOm4AbDER@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).