From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A9B033858C83; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:31:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A9B033858C83 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1666117913; bh=9NFWKrO91S92vTgGO1fcz1mwoZekqiiTHItzGGkWCyo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iV3K+UK41uYp1KRoFeWIpvBhx07zG7linjhfJyZdH9NXixxtY+9NGFIPm6AQgCru9 1FNLBIAq//bnZvKkT3Me0e0fq5xQLejcY3kJcwYDa4/VZz9AZG0thYpCT7sqkRhYZh kJWLDGlo8DWgdt9ltpNtS2Cz/ToI16Pputtjk3T0= From: "tromey at sourceware dot org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug symtab/29106] new DWARF reader should de-duplicate functions Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:31:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: symtab X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tromey at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.1 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29106 Tom Tromey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey --- As part of another bug, I looked into this some more: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-October/192662.html In particular I generated a .gdb_index for a copy of gdb, using both the old and new gdb (that is, before and after the new DWARF reader). Then I compared the list of symbols. In every case I checked, the new gdb was correct. (Well, to be clear, there was one case that was incorrect, but I landed a patch to fix this.) So, I tend to think that the old index was simply missing some entries, and nobody noticed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=