From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E43D13858406; Fri,  2 Sep 2022 12:55:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E43D13858406
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1662123319;
	bh=iUTfdG+k76+o9yVVmTwq4GyYGmoQNkOVS9MY1BkESUY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xxiXIupzr59KwrgNaLfvvd95ULW9Jd7yRx4MP7R7l7VSycyffvANhoAYEqFesOs0n
	 puxomWkBAT353wV/bTE3tCr3tquZeCG3UscMPfX3qkTQfBXmqNV3N4xny10dJpyerH
	 70HwEfOLkz3PJDeXcccQnpgiA+cJ68HrY4+bgtCI=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug tdep/29247] [gdb, tdep] ../../gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c:1945:
 internal-error: ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value: Assertion `ok' failed
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 12:55:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29247-4717-KdHW26msfx@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29247-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29247-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29247

--- Comment #27 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #23)
> Unfortunately, I don't have access to a machine atm to investigate this.

I was able to get my hands on a machine, and reproduced it.

I minimized it to:
...
$ cat gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/varargs.c
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

long double _Complex orig =3D 4.0L + 4.0Li;
long double _Complex copy =3D 0L + 0Li;

int
test (void)
{
  return 0;
}

void
do_copy (int num_vals, ...)
{
#if 1
  va_list argp;
  va_start (argp, num_vals);
  copy =3D va_arg (argp, long double _Complex);
#else
  copy =3D orig;
#endif
}

void
_start (void)
{
  test ();

  while (1)
    ;
}
...
and:
...
$ cat gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/varargs.exp
standard_testfile .c

set additional_flags {debug}
lappend additional_flags "additional_flags=3D-nostdlib"

# build the first test case
if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" \
           executable ${additional_flags}] !=3D "" } {
     untested "failed to compile"
     return -1
}

# Start with a fresh gdb.

clean_restart ${binfile}

gdb_test_no_output "set print sevenbit-strings"
gdb_test_no_output "set print address off"
gdb_test_no_output "set width 0"

runto test

gdb_test "print orig" ".*=3D 4 \\+ 4i"
gdb_test "print copy" ".*=3D 0 \\+ 0i"

gdb_test "print do_copy (1, orig)"

with_test_prefix "after copy" {
    gdb_test "print orig" ".*=3D 4 \\+ 4i"
    gdb_test "print copy" ".*=3D 4 \\+ 4i"
}
...

This doesn't seem to be related to the return value passing bit, so I propo=
se
to close this PR and file a new one (assuming this is an unknown issue).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=