public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org> To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug build/29308] [gdb/build] python 3.10 problems Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:27:03 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-29308-4717-nZ3wRwH5TO@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-29308-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29308 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Simon Marchi from comment #1) > Why do we ship our own python-config.py? Here ( https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2010-May/074836.html ) is mentioned: ... python-config is a python script so it won't work when build != host. ... > We could maybe rely on the > python-config scripts shipped with Python installations. I'll give that a try. > I guess that > python-config scripts were maybe not always there in the past? > AFAICT, the python-config shell script was introduced starting 3.4. >From looking at the cpython.git sources, the python-config python script appeared in 2.7, but looking at the original commit of gdb/python/python-config.py is mentions a copy from 2.6.5, so perhaps I'm missing something. > We would append `-config` to the python executable. Since you passed > --with-python=python3, it means python3 is in your PATH, so python3-config > should also exist in your PATH. > FWIW, I need to install python3-devel to get python3-config, in addition to the python3 package, but that's not a problem of course. I need to install lots of -devel packages to be able to build gdb. > My guess is that since python-config scripts are now shell scripts, they can > be executed on the build machine even cross-compiling. So maybe it would > simplify the case described here: > > https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/CrossCompilingWithPythonSupport > > Not sure. AFAICT, that was exactly the purpose of moving to a shell script. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-01 9:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-06-30 17:01 [Bug build/29308] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-30 17:48 ` [Bug build/29308] " simark at simark dot ca 2022-07-01 9:27 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-07-01 9:28 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-01 9:35 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-01 9:53 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-01 15:14 ` kevinb at redhat dot com 2022-07-01 15:18 ` simark at simark dot ca 2022-07-02 9:17 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-02 9:43 ` [Bug build/29308] [gdb/build] python 3.12 problems vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-01 9:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-29308-4717-nZ3wRwH5TO@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \ --cc=gdb-prs@sourceware.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).