From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 538B0384D1A7; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:34:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 538B0384D1A7
From: "pedro at palves dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug build/29373] Canadian Compilation Failed!
 gdbsupport/packed.h:41:40: error: static assertion failed for
 x86_64-w64-mingw32 host.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:34:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb
X-Bugzilla-Component: build
X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pedro at palves dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29373-4717-P4KbGHIFjJ@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29373-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29373-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list <gdb-prs.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-prs/>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-prs>,
 <mailto:gdb-prs-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:34:29 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29373

--- Comment #11 from Pedro Alves <pedro at palves dot net> ---
LOL, neverending story.  Clang 10 doesn't need the alternative implementati=
on,
but clang 14 does.  Maybe Clang didn't implement MS bitfields properly in
version 10 yet.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=