From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0D9CE3858288; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:57:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D9CE3858288 From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gdb-prs@sourceware.org Subject: [Bug tdep/29409] [gdb, tdep/aarch64] FAIL: gdb.opt/inline-small-func.exp: info breakpoints Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:57:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gdb X-Bugzilla-Component: tdep X-Bugzilla-Version: HEAD X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gdb-prs@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-prs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:57:09 -0000 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29409 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 14233 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D14233&action=3Ded= it Demonstrator patch This patch fixes the fail for me with gcc 7.5.0, by only trusting gcc 8.1 a= nd later. Interestingly, that alone was not enough, and I also needed this bit: ... @@ -302,6 +303,8 @@ aarch64_analyze_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, regs[i] =3D pv_register (i, 0); pv_area stack (AARCH64_SP_REGNUM, gdbarch_addr_bit (gdbarch)); + CORE_ADDR orig_start =3D start; + for (; start < limit; start +=3D 4) { uint32_t insn; @@ -544,7 +547,7 @@ aarch64_analyze_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, } if (cache =3D=3D NULL) - return start; + return seen_stack_set ? start : orig_start; if (pv_is_register (regs[AARCH64_FP_REGNUM], AARCH64_SP_REGNUM)) { @@ -583,7 +586,7 @@ aarch64_analyze_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, cache->saved_regs[i + regnum + AARCH64_D0_REGNUM].set_addr (offset); } - return start; + return seen_stack_set ? start : orig_start; } static CORE_ADDR ... which is roughly equivalent with this bit for amd64: ... if (cache.frameless_p) return start_pc; ... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=